Mr Modi’s warrior trolls

BY TCA SRINIVASA RAGHAVAN| IN Books | 02/01/2017
The author interviewed several of those who troll. They belong to the lower sub-stratum of the BJP, which has a pretty sophisticated upper stratum as well.
Will the PM explain why he follows them, asks TCA SRINIVASA RAGHAVAN

 

Book Review

I Am A Troll
By Swati Chaturvedi
Juggernaut
Rs 250, pp 250

 

 

Let me start by narrating an episode from May 2013. The Hindu Business Line was launching its Ahmedabad edition and Chief Minister Modi had kindly agreed to give a speech. It is available here.

Mr Modi was categorical: it was social media that he cared about, not the conventional ones. Social media, he said, was a very powerful platform from which to send out your messages.

I am pretty certain he did not have trolling as an important constituent of these messages. But that is what seems to have happened after he became Prime Minister.

Online abuse and threats are called trolling. Swati Chaturvedi who is a journalist, investigated the political ones.

She says the BJP under Narendra Modi has made trolling an everyday affair and a weapon of choice. If you criticise him, his party, his government, or the country, you get trolled by a very large number of people who think you deserve to be abused and threatened. 

She says this is done in a systematic way, under direction. The trolls are called yodhdhas or warriors. The examples she cites are sickening. The book makes you feel very uncomfortable.

The abuse can refer to your mother’s vagina – ‘hole’ in troll language. The threats can be to your life. If you are woman, well you bitch, how about a nice little rape?

 

The lay of the land

Ms Chaturvedi has substantiated her findings after interviewing several of those who troll who said the targets deserved it all. All of them belong to the lower sub-stratum of the BJP, which has a pretty sophisticated upper stratum as well who can be seen on TV and be read in different publications – the very platforms Mr Modi despises.

The former live, as it were, below stairs and are seen only by those whom they troll. Ms Chaturvedi says a visitation can be very traumatic. I can imagine why. I once got trolled by a Leftist troll.

That said, I feel it is not up to journalists to grumble and moan. They have entered the fray with their eyes wide open -- unlike others who have no idea of how politics actually functions on rumours, innuendo, character assassination, threats, beatings and even murder sometimes – and should be able to take the heat.

It’s not a gentle avocation and journalists should not expect it to be so, especially the ones who are politically aligned. Abuse is abuse, polite or vicious.

 

Own up

Overall, however, the BJP despite its vociferous defence and denials, emerges looking like Janus or those half-beast half-human gods. It therefore has lot of explaining to do, not least because Prime Minister Narendra Modi follows – or followed when the book went to press -- many of the nastiest specimens amongst the trolls. He even invited them to tea in 2015. This is truly awful.

So it is not just the BJP but Mr Modi also who needs to explain. After all, you are known by the company you keep. At the very least he needs to stop following them. 

 

 

The Hoot is the only not-for-profit initiative in India which does independent media monitoring. Your support is vital for this website. Click here to make a contribution.
Subscribe To The Newsletter

The National Herald has announced  that Neelabh Mishra, Editor-in-Chief of National Herald and Navjeevan, died on February 24 after a long illness, in Chennai. He was formerly editor of the Hindi Outlook until 2015, and became editor of NH in 2016. He began his career from the Navbharat Times in Patna, and launched Eenadu TV in Rajasthan in 1998. Tributes to him on Twitter describe him as  deeply committed to egalitarian and secular values.                                             

The Hindu, The Times of India and  Hindustan Times reported the most controversial parts of the Army chief's Feb 21 speech on immigration in the North East and the growth of the AIUDF as a party. It was only Indian Express that reported a longer excerpt, in which he spoke of amalgamation rather than identification as a solution in Assam, and pointed out that Muslims had come to Assam with the Ahoms in the 1200s and had equal rights over the land. "Both these people have claim to the state of Assam and therefore to the North East region," the army chief said.  Why didn't the others report this crucial admission, which is rarely heard? Because it would have gone against the sensational headlines all the papers gave to their report of the speech? The headlines either highlighted Rawat's comparison between the growth of Badruddin Ajmal's  AIUDF's and the BJP, or his accusation that Pakistan and China were driving the illegal immigration into the North East.                     

            

View More