Plagiarism in Indiatimes

IN Media Practice | 16/04/2002
The people who have actually worked hard to put together the Dvaita FAQ are quite displeased at the Times of India`s chicanery

The people who have actually worked hard to put together the Dvaita FAQ are quite displeased at the Times of India`s chicanery, and the newspaper`s moral turpitude rightly gives rise to questions about their journalistic competence as well. The Times of India owes the Dvaita community, as well as their own readers, an honest and unconditional apology as well as a promise to improve its behavior in future.

Regards,

Shrisha Rao
http://www.dvaita.org
http://www.dvaita.net

We reproduce the two versions below

 

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More