For the public, a redressal mechanism

BY NBA| IN Law and Policy | 02/09/2008
A regulatory authority constituted by private broadcasters will now take up complaints from the public against TV channels.
Excerpts from the regulations prescribed.

The News Broadcasters Association, the body drawing up self regulation  for the broadcasting industry, has announced a regulatory authority to be chaired by former Chief Justice of India, J. S. Verma. It will become  operational from October 2. The other eight members have been equally divided into the ‘eminent persons’ and ‘editors’ categories. The eminent persons are historian Ramachandra Guha, the former NASSCOM president Kiran Karnik, sociologist Dipankar Gupta and economist Nitin Desai. The editors are Vinod Kapri of India TV, B. V. Rao of Zee News, Milind Khandekar of Star News and Arnab Goswami of Times Now.

 

 

 

News Broadcasting Standards

(Disputes Redressal) Regulations

 

 

6. Objects and functions of the Authority

 

 

6.1     The objects of the Authority shall be to entertain and decide complaints against or in respect of  broadcasters, television journalists and/or news agencies in so far as these relate to the content of any broadcast.

 

6.2     In discharging its function of adjudicating upon complaints as aforesaid the Authority shall act consistently with the following precepts :

 

6.2.1   Maintaining and improving the standards of broadcast, and maintaining the independence of broadcasters, television journalists and/or news agencies ;       

 

6.2.2   Ensuring compliance by broadcasters, television journalists and news agencies with  the  Code of Conduct and adherence by the said persons to high professional standards;

 

6.2.3   Ensuring the maintenance of high standards of public taste and fostering a due sense of both the rights and responsibilities of citizens;

 

6.2.4   Fostering and encouraging the growth of a sense of responsibility and public service among all those engaged in and associated with the profession of television journalism and business of broadcasting ;

 

6.2.5   Keeping under review and scrutiny any developments likely to or having the tendency to restrict the gathering, supply and dissemination of news of public interest and importance;

 

6.2.6   Such other aspects as may be incidental, consequential, related and/or otherwise materially concerned with the above precepts.

 

7.         Powers of Authority

 

7.1     Where, on receipt of a complaint made to it or otherwise, the Authority has reason to believe that a broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency has violated or offended against the Code of Conduct  or that a television journalist has committed any professional misconduct in relation to a broadcast, the Authority may, after giving the broadcaster, television journalist or news agency concerned an opportunity of being heard, hold an inquiry in such manner as is provided by these Regulations and, if it is satisfied that it is necessary so to do, it may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, warn, admonish, censure, express disapproval against and/or impose a fine upon the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency and/or recommend to the concerned authority for suspension / revocation of license / accreditation of such broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency ;

                                        

Provided that the fine imposed by the Authority shall not exceed Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) and such fine shall be recovered from the concerned broadcaster and/or news agency ;

 

Provided also that the Authority may not take cognizance of a complaint if, in the opinion of the Chairperson, there is no sufficient ground for holding an inquiry.

 

7.2     If the Authority is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient in the public interest so to do, it may direct  any broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency to cause to be published through a press release in such newspaper or other periodical and/or on such website, information relating to any inquiry conducted against the broadcaster, television journalist or news agency as  the Authority decides including the warning, admonition, censure, disapproval issued and/or fine imposed and any other particulars relating to the proceedings as the Authority thinks fit ; and the broadcaster, television journalist and news agency shall comply with directions ;

 

Provided also that the Authority shall publish a summary of every inquiry conducted by it on its website and in its Annual Report and newsletter published from time to time ;

 

Provided that nothing in Regulation shall be deemed to empower the Authority to hold an inquiry into any matter in respect of which any proceeding is pending in a Court of law.

 

7.3     For the purposes of adjudicating upon any complaint or holding any inquiry under these Regulations, the Authority shall have the power of :

 

7.3.1   summoning persons and examining them and         requiring the production and inspection of documents;

           

7.3.2   receiving evidence ;

           

7.3.3   requisitioning any records or copies thereof from any broadcaster, television journalist or news agency, including in particular the footage (both edited and unedited) of any broadcast ;

 

Provided that nothing in Regulation shall be deemed to empower the Authority to compel any broadcaster, television journalist or news agency to disclose the source of any news or information broadcast or to be broadcast.

 

7.4     The Authority shall,  on the filing  of  complaints and for the purposes of performing its functions under these Regulations, levy fee of Rs. 1,000/- per complaint upon the complainant, in such manner as the Authority may prescribe ; and the Authority shall also have the power to impose costs not exceeding Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) in favour of or against complainants.

 

7.5     No suit or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Authority, the Chairperson or any Member/s thereof or any person acting under the direction of the Authority in respect of anything which is done or intended to done in good faith under these Regulations.

 

7.6     No suit or other legal proceeding shall lie against any broadcaster, television journalist or news agency in respect of the broadcast of any matter under or in compliance of the orders/directions the Authority

8.         Procedure for dealing with Complaints

Contents of Complaint

8.1     Any complaint made to the Authority in respect of or against a broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency:

8.1.1   shall state the name and address of the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency, against which or against whom the complaint is preferred ;

8.1.2   shall state the time of the broadcast alongwith the substance of the contents of the broadcast and/or the text of the broadcast complained of (if such text be available) and the details of the misconduct complained of ;

8.1.3   shall also include such other particulars as are relevant to the subject-matter of the complaint;

8.1.4   shall state in what manner the broadcast violates or offends against the Code of Conduct and/or is otherwise objectionable ;

8.1.5   shall enclose a copy of the letter written by the complainant to the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency drawing the attention of the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency, as the case may be, to the subject matter of the complaint stating the complainant’s grievances alongwith reasons therefor together with a copy of the reply, if any, received by the complainant thereto  ;

Provided that it shall be encumbent upon the complainant to give to the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency at least 30 (thirty) days to respond to the letter of complaint written by the complainant, failing which the Authority shall not entertain any complaint.

8.1.6   A complaint may be made in English or Hindi ; and if any documents in support thereof are in the vernacular, true translations thereof in English or Hindi must be filed alongwith the complaint.

Provided that the Authority shall not entertain any complaint unless before filing the complaint before the Authority, the complainant has in writing drawn the attention of the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency as aforesaid; and either the broadcaster, television journalist and/or the news agency has not responded or the complainant is not satisfied with or the complainant’s grievance is not redressed by such response.

8.2     A complaint shall be filed before the Authority within 60 (sixty) days of the first broadcast of the matter complained of ; and in the case of a complaint relating to any professional misconduct, within 60 (sixty) days of the date the complainant first learned of the professional misconduct complained of ;

Provided that if a complaint is presented after the expiration of the period provided therefor, the Authority may, if it is satisfied that the complainant has acted diligently and that the delay in filing the complaint within the prescribed period has been caused for reasons not of the complaint’s making and/or for other sufficient cause, condone the delay and entertain a complaint ;

Provided that notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in these Regulations, the Authority shall in writing inform any broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency to retain and preserve records of any broadcast that may be subject matter of a complaint, within 90 (ninety) days of first broadcast, failing which a broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency shall be under no obligation to retain or preserve such records.

8.3     In every case the Complainant shall place all relevant and material facts before the Authority;

8.4     The complainant shall, at the foot of the complaint, make and subscribe a declaration to the effect:

8.4.1   that the facts stated in the complaint are true and correct to the best of the complainant’s knowledge and belief ;

8.4.2   that the complainant has placed all relevant facts before the Authority and has not concealed any material facts ;

8.4.3   that no proceedings are pending in any Court of law in respect of the subject matter complained of before the Authority ; and

8.4.4   that the complainant shall inform the Authority forthwith if during the pendency of the inquiry before the Authority the matter alleged in the complaint becomes the subject-matter of any proceedings in a Court of law.

8.5     Where a complainant does not comply with the requirements of these Regulations, the Chairperson may return the complaint by any mode of recorded delivery, asking the complainant to bring it in conformity with such requirements and re-present it within such time as the Authority may grant.

8.6     Where a complainant fails to comply with the requirements as aforesaid  set-out by the Authority within  the time so prescribed, the Chairperson may terminate proceedings in the matter ; and the Authority shall, at its next meeting, be apprised of such decision. 

8.7     Not later than 30 (thirty) days from the date of receipt of a complaint complete in all respects, under the directions of the Chairperson, a copy thereof shall be sent to the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency against which or whom the complaint has been made, along with a notice requiring the broadcaster, television journalist, and/or news agency, as the case may be, to show cause why action should not be taken against it under these Regulations giving to the television channel  a period of 30 (thirty) days to respond to such show cause notice;

Provided that in appropriate cases the Chairperson shall have the discretion to extend time for the issuance of notice and/or for response as aforesaid ;

Provided further that the Chairperson may decide not to issue a notice to show cause to a broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency or any of them, where, in his opinion, there is no sufficient ground for holding an inquiry ; and the Authority at its next meeting shall be apprised by the Chairperson of the reasons for his decision not to issue notice and the Authority may then pass such orders as it deems fit upon such complaint.

8.8     The notice so issued alongwith a complete copy of the complaint and all documents relied upon by the complainant, shall be sent to the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency, by any mode of recorded delivery, at the address/es furnished in the complaint.

8.9     Notice of the time, date and place of hearing shall be served upon the complainant as well as on the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency, as the case may be, and shall be sent to them by any mode of recorded delivery.

8.10    The broadcaster, television journalist and/or agency against which or whom the complaint is made may, within 30 (thirty) days from the date of service of the notice alongwith a complete copy of the complaint and all documents relied upon by the complainant or within such further time as may be granted by the Chairperson upon application in this behalf, submit a written statement to the Authority in reply to the complaint and send a copy of such written statement to the complainant by any mode of recorded delivery.

8.11    After receipt of the complaint or written statement, the Chairperson may, if he considers necessary, call for any further information either from the complainant or the respondent-broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency, as the case may be, in order to clarify matters appearing in or arising from the complaint or written statement and in doing so, the Chairperson may call for such additional statements and/or documents as the Chairperson may consider necessary ; and all the statements and documents called for shall form part of the record and shall be placed before the Authority at the time of the inquiry.

8.12    The Authority may, after considering the complaint and the written statement, if it so desires, call for such additional particulars or documents relevant to the subject-matter of the complaint as it may consider necessary from both the parties or from either of them.

8.13    Where at any time in the course of the inquiry into the complaint it appears to the Authority that the subject-matter of the complaint is substantially the same as, or has been covered by, any former complaint dealt with by the Authority under these regulations, the Authority shall hear the complainant, if he desires to be heard and also if the Authority considers it necessary, the broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency, as the case may be, and pass such orders  or directions as it may consider necessary and the same shall be duly communicated to the parties.

8.14  If during any inquiry being conducted by the Authority the complainant fails to appear at any hearing without sufficient cause, the Authority may dismiss the complaint ; and if the respondent-broadcaster, television journalist or news agency fails to appear at any hearing without sufficient cause, the Authority may proceed to decide the complaint ex parte as against the party so failing to appear, as the Authority may deem fit.

Provided however that if within 30 (thirty) days of dismissal of a complaint or the passing of any ex parte orders/directions, a party aggrieved thereby applies to the Authority to restore the complaint or set-aside the ex parte orders/directions so passed and shows sufficient cause for its previous non-appearance, the Authority may restore the complaint or set-aside the ex parte orders/directions and decide the matter / decide the matter afresh.

8.15    At the inquiry before the Authority parties shall be entitled to adduce relevant evidence, oral and documentary, and make submissions in support of their contentions.

8.16    At the close of an inquiry the Authority shall record its findings upon the allegations contained in the complaint together with its reasons therefor and pass such orders and directions as provided under these Regulations as it may deem fit.

8.17    Every case shall be determined as per the majority view of the Members and the Chairperson’s view shall have the same weightage as that of any Member.

Provided that no Member shall take part in the proceedings and/or decision of any complaint in which such Member has any direct involvement or commercial interest or in which such Member is interested as an agent or representative of any broadcaster, television journalist and/or news agency as the case may be and such Member shall opt-out of such proceedings.

Provided that if any Member or Members have to opt-out as aforesaid, the NBA shall forthwith upon such occurrence nominate a substitute Member or Members to fill-up the vacancy for a particular inquiry.

8.18    The orders / directions of the Authority shall be communicated in writing to the parties to the case and shall also be duly publicized as may be directed by the Authority, including on the NBA website, Annual Report and NBA newsletter.

8.19    In any inquiry under these Regulations a party to the proceedings may appear in person or be represented by Counsel or by a duly authorised representative.

8.20    The Authority shall have the power to regulate its own procedure in respect of any matter for which no provision or inadequate provision is made in these Regulations and shall also have the power in appropriate cases to hold inquiries in camera.

8.21    Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in these Regulations, any inquiry commenced under these Regulations shall be completed within a maximum period of 6 (six) months from the date of receipt of the complaint.

8.22    The Authority may suo motu initiate proceedings and issue notice or, as the case may be, take action in respect of any matter which falls within the mischief contemplated in these Regulations or relating to any matter falling within or arising from the Code of Conduct, and in such case all other procedures prescribed herein shall, mutatis mutandis, be followed as if such proceedings were a complaint.

 

 

                                                                            

 

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More